thoughts on the final proposal…

A apologize for the overly academic tone. 

I would like to address the re-design of the Historic Naval Ships Association (HNSA) website (www.hnsa.org) for my final project proposal.  The current HNSA website is basic in its design, providing the public with minimal information about the organization of the naval and maritime memorials and cultural institutions it represents and therefore is vastly under-utilized by the public. 

 

At the 2006 annual HNSA conference, several members of the organization questioned why the HNSA existed.  Members of HNSA are scattered throughout the world, a majority though, are in the continental United States.  Members include historic naval ships (ships that are now museums or memorials), naval museums, or maritime museums and naval organizations.  Most are currently facing decreased visitation, dwindling staff and increased competition with other cultural entities in their areas.  The World War II generation has been the “bread and butter” of the ships and museums. As this generation gets older and travels less, the ships and museums aren’t making as much money as they have in the past. Several of the members are addressing this problem by enticing new audiences to visit their institutions.  Most of the organization seems “lost” though.  Directors realize there is a problem, but don’t know how to address it or what the way forward is.  The average age of 80% of the active organization is 65-70, and to many of the ship/museum directors, a computer has never been an overly integral part of their day-to-day operations, and its certainly never been needed to help bring visitors to their institutions.  Many don’t understand that a revitalized website, logo and brand is a first step in making the organization relevant to a new generation of visitors. 

 

There are several successful websites currently run by individual HNSA members.  Elements of these sites will be examined as the HNSA site is redesigned. Non-naval oriented history sites will also be consulted in the research process, along with popular cultural and educational sites. 

 

By employing interactive maps, organized sound and document archives and educational resources, the HNSA website can become more then the then a mere listing of cultural institutions (the current website does include links to all of its members individual websites.)  The redesigned website would become a repository for oral histories and photographs, requiring the creation of a user-friendly database to organize donated material into a user-friendly format.  The new website would show the next generation of museum visitors why HNSA is important and relevant to their lives and that the museums and ships which make up the organization are places to visit and learn from.

Advertisements

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

3 responses to “thoughts on the final proposal…

  1. tad

    The website could definitely use a little jazzing up, but it’s cool that you’re starting with something where there’s already available information, etc.

    Of course, you’ll probably end up with some things being kind of a pain because you’ll have to redo things, and reverse-engineer things, and stuff like that, but I still like the idea of making improvements on an extant page rather than starting from scratch– not the smallest benefit of which would be that you already have some people out there who are familiar with the site!

    Have you thought about trying to gather suggestions and/or complaints about the current site from members and users?

  2. Like Tad, I think it’s an interesting, if potentially troublesome, idea to start with an existing site. In this case, I’m particularly wondering about how you’re going to balance the particular identity of the HNSA as a larger directory of pointers to resources created by individual members, against the more interesting things you’re proposing (which involve doing actual historical work under the umbrella of the HNSA *itself*). This gets at the bigger questions of the role of a professional/trade association in the online world of Google searches and self-publishing, and I’m eager to see how you deal with them in this proposal…

  3. Karin – how much of the center’s mission is tied to Navy support as opposed to public support? What services does the center provide to PAOs, newly commissioned units, decommisioning units, other naval museums, naval training (enlisted and officer), or other organizations like the Naval Safety Center or Naval War College that need help in archiving past reports and investigations? Emphasizing these tasks might provide a path to additional funding or resources, as these organizations have a certain amount of existing infrastructure (servers, archives, storage space, personnel)and also have a comparatively easier time obtaining funding. If the center wants to obtain additional funding from the Navy, it needs to emphasize it’s relevance to the Navy. I might also be worth exploring non-tarditional sources of support such as the Navy Memorial and the Naval Institute, which are private organizations but might be worth hooking up with. USNI has a certain amount of their Oral History project available on line – is the center linked to it?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s